The Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Bill is currently going through parliament and one particular clause targets squatters. Clause 130 of the bill, if passed, would make squatting a criminal offence as opposed to a civil one as is currently the case and will cause it to punishable with a maximum fine of 5,000.
However, is this the right way to deal with the problem? Shouldn’t this government be tackling the problem of homelessness instead? Recent figures released by the charity Crisis suggest that 40% of single homeless people have squatted at one time or another, with many of these people having mental health or other issues.
So, the argument goes, these include some of the more vulnerable in society, with a life expectancy of 47 for a homeless man and only 43 for a homeless women. There is also a point to be made that criminal law as it stands does already cover squatting because it is an offence under the Criminal Law Act of 1977 to squat and use utilities without paying or cause criminal damage. So, in the event the law was correctly applied, some squatting cases could be resolved swiftly.
So, there are measures that a homeowner faced with this problem may take, although they need proper enforcement by police as opposed to introducing a new law, a stance which is opposed by both the Law Society and the Criminal Bar Association amongst others.
There are many others of course who believe that the law, as it currently stands, does not protect homeowners, and there have been many stories through the years of the huge problems law abiding people may have when trying to get rid of squatters from their own property. So, which side of this argument are you on? Should the law, as it stands, be more strictly enforced or is a new law necessary to make squatting a criminal rather than a civil offence which will safeguard homeowners? We want to hear what you think.